Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 7600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 7600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 109 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 7600.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $150.15 vs $323.84
- Up to 52% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-13900KF - $0.58 vs $1.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen 5 7600 - 294 vs 285 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
285
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€166.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €166.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
294
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.22/FPS
48%
Price, €
€359.46
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for €359.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 7600 | vs | Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 14th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raphael | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |