Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1646 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600X.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600X
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $157.66 vs $436.94
- Up to 59% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-14900F - $0.89 vs $2.18 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 13% better in God of War than Ryzen 5 3600X - 200 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 32 vs 12 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
177
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €157.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2834 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
200
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.18/FPS
41%
Price, €
€436.94
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €436.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2833 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 3600X | vs | Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |