Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 298 days older than the more expensive Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600X
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $157.66 vs $201.80
- Up to 22% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-10700F - $1.27 vs $1.63 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 16 vs 12 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
124
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €157.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
Buy for €201.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 3600X | vs | Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |