The Ryzen 5 3400G is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-4130 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $42.99 more expensive!
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 3400G
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the FX-4130
- Up to 48% cheaper – $46.86 vs $89.85
Ryzen 5 3400G vs FX-4130 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 5 3400G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
180
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, €
€89.85
52%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
57%
Ryzen 5 3400G vs FX-4130 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 3400G vs FX-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 5 3400G vs FX-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 5 3400G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
93%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
64%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 5 3400G | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| $149.00 | MSRP | $112.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Picasso | Codename | Zambezi |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
