Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1563 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $104.24 vs $338.95
- Up to 67% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-14900KF - $0.43 vs $1.30 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Ryzen 5 3400G - 289 vs 270 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 32 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
270
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€115.71
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €115.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
289
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.3/FPS
33%
Price, €
€376.23
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for €376.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |