Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 1622 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - $153.15 vs $341.19
- Up to 42% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 9 7900X - $1.47 vs $2.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 95 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 30% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 2600X - 135 vs 104 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
104
77%
Value, €/FPS
€1.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€153.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €153.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6854 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.53/FPS
58%
Price, €
€341.19
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for €341.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6853 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 170 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |