Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 1668 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 1400
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $77.11 vs $230.09
- Up to 60% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-12900K - $0.48 vs $1.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 20% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 1400 - 214 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1400 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
178
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€85.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €85.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 291 minutes ago
Buy for €255.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 290 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 1400 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |