Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 561 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 4100.
Advantages of Ryzen 3 4100
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $63.84 vs $390.09
- Up to 78% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-14900K - $0.11 vs $0.50 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 38% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 3 4100 - 784 vs 568 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 4100 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
568
72%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.84
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6847 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
784
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
22%
Price, €
€390.09
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €390.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6847 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 4100 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |