The Ryzen 3 3300X is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-6100, however, it's a worse value for money, as it's $100.31 more expensive!
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3300X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of the FX-6100
- Up to 79% cheaper – $26.71 vs $127.02
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Ryzen 3 3300X cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Ryzen 3 3300X vs FX-6100 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 3 3300X
Apr 24th, 2020
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, €
€127.02
21%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
24%
Ryzen 3 3300X vs FX-6100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 3 3300X vs FX-6100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 3 3300X vs FX-6100 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 3 3300X
Apr 24th, 2020
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
84%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 3 3300X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
$120.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Matisse | Codename | Zambezi |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
16 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |