Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1563 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $64.12 vs $338.95
- Up to 76% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-14900KF - $0.18 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 25% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen 3 3200G - 499 vs 398 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
398
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€71.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €71.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
499
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
24%
Price, €
€376.23
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €376.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |