Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 851 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $64.12 vs $219.10
- Up to 67% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-12900KF - $0.14 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 10% better in World of Tanks than Ryzen 3 3200G - 574 vs 522 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 24 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
522
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€71.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €71.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
574
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
33%
Price, €
€243.2
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €243.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |