The Ryzen 3 2300X is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 2300X
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-10900KF
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 4 threads
Ryzen 3 2300X vs Core i9-10900KF for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 3 2300X
Sep 10th, 2018
Average FPS
182
94%
Min 1% FPS
121
95%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
193
100%
Min 1% FPS
128
100%
Price, €
€263.58
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.36/FPS
100%
Ryzen 3 2300X vs Core i9-10900KF in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 3 2300X vs Core i9-10900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 3 2300X vs Core i9-10900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 3 2300X
Sep 10th, 2018
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
75%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 3 2300X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Not Available | MSRP | $509.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.3 GHz |
4 MB | L3 Cache | 20 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |