The Ryzen 3 2200G is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-6100, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $90.41 more expensive!
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 2200G
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the FX-6100
- Up to 77% cheaper – $26.71 vs $117.12
- A better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 6 vs 4 threads
Ryzen 3 2200G vs FX-6100 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 3 2200G
Feb 12th, 2018
Average FPS
178
100%
Min 1% FPS
118
100%
Price, €
€117.12
22%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
25%
Ryzen 3 2200G vs FX-6100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 3 2200G vs FX-6100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 3 2200G vs FX-6100 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 3 2200G
Feb 12th, 2018
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 3 2200G | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| $99.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Zambezi |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
