Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1787 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $117.12 vs $765.76
- Up to 82% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-13400F - $0.71 vs $3.89 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 20% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 3 2200G - 197 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
164
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€117.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €117.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7259 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
197
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.89/FPS
18%
Price, €
€765.76
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7257 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |