The Phenom X4 9650 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-7600 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $68.49 cheaper!
Advantages of the Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 79% cheaper – $17.97 vs $86.46
Advantages of the Core i5-7600
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
Phenom X4 9650 vs Core i5-7600 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Phenom X4 9650
Mar 27th, 2008
Average FPS
163
88%
Min 1% FPS
110
89%
Price, €
€17.97
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Core i5-7600
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, €
€86.46
20%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
24%
Phenom X4 9650 vs Core i5-7600 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Phenom X4 9650 vs Core i5-7600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Phenom X4 9650 vs Core i5-7600 in core CPU performance specifications
Phenom X4 9650
Mar 27th, 2008
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
2 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-7600
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Phenom X4 9650 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-7600 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Agena | Codename | Kaby Lake |
95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 GHz |
2 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
unknown | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |