The Phenom II X4 B95 is a slower gaming CPU than the FX-8320E, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's $112.68 cheaper!
Advantages of the Phenom II X4 B95
- Up to 70% cheaper – $47.70 vs $160.38
- A much better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the FX-8320E
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Phenom II X4 B95 vs FX-8320E for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Phenom II X4 B95
Oct 1st, 2009
Average FPS
165
99%
Min 1% FPS
111
99%
Price, €
€47.7
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Phenom II X4 B95 vs FX-8320E in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Phenom II X4 B95 vs FX-8320E in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Phenom II X4 B95 vs FX-8320E in core CPU performance specifications
Phenom II X4 B95
Oct 1st, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.012 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
71%
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Phenom II X4 B95 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320E |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $147.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Deneb | Codename | Vishera |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
| 6 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1333 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
