Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G6950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 5031 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Pentium G6950
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $34.17 vs $375.64
- Up to 88% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-14900KF - $0.09 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 37% better in Battlefield IV than Pentium G6950 - 499 vs 365 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 32 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
365
73%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€34.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €34.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7427 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
499
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
12%
Price, €
€375.64
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for €375.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7426 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G6950 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
73 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |