Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4560 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4560 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 1766 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4560.
Advantages of Pentium G4560
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - $23.54 vs $140.41
- Up to 79% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-12600K - $0.22 vs $1.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 28% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium G4560 - 152 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4560 - 16 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
119
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€26.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €26.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
152
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
21%
Price, €
€155.85
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €155.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4560 | vs | Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |