Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4707 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 20% better in God of War than Xeon X5680 - 195 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5680 - 32 vs 12 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€353.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |