Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 2986 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 14% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon X5680 - 104 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon X5680 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5680 - 16 vs 12 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
104
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€170.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12955 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |