Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Xeon X5677 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 1637 days newer than Xeon X5677.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon X5677 - 176 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Xeon X5677 - 120 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5677 - 24 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5677 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Xeon | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |