Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600 outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14600 is 4711 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600
- Performs up to 35% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon X5675 - 157 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5675 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon X5675
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Core i5-14600
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon X5675
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Single-Core
499
18.584729981378025%
Multi-Core
2394
17.793964620187307%
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Core i5-14600 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 14 |
| 12 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
