Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600T outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600T is 4342 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600T
- Performs up to 17% better in DOOM Eternal than Xeon X5675 - 530 vs 452 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Xeon X5675
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Core i5-13600T
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon X5675
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Single-Core
499
21.179966044142613%
Multi-Core
2394
19.49987782031441%
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600T |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 14 |
| 12 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
