Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 4711 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 26% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon X5675 - 149 vs 118 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
149
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15385 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |