Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7640HS outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7640HS is 4364 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
- Performs up to 12% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon X5675 - 130 vs 116 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Mobile • Jan 26th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Single-Core
499
21.573713791612626%
Multi-Core
2394
26.526315789473685%
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 43.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 760M |
No | Overclockable | No |