Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100T outperforms Xeon X5670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100T is 2939 days newer than Xeon X5670.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5670
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 10% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Xeon X5670 - 135 vs 123 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon X5670 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5670 doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon X5670
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i3-8100T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon X5670
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Single-Core
482
44.920782851817336%
Multi-Core
2257
74.56227287743641%
Intel Xeon X5670 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100T |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
