Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Xeon X5660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 4578 days newer than Xeon X5660.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5660
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 20% better in Rocket League than Xeon X5660 - 809 vs 673 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5660 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5660 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
809
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€381.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €381.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13864 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5660 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |