Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Xeon X5660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2940 days newer than Xeon X5660.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5660
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 3% better in Minecraft than Xeon X5660 - 619 vs 599 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon X5660 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5660 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
619
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5660 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |