Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 5046 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 16% better in Dead Space than Xeon X5650 - 167 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5650 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€470.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €470.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |