Buy on Amazon
€39.77
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-2100 outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-2100 is 341 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Performs up to 1% better in Minecraft than Xeon X5650 - 602 vs 597 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon X5650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-2100
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
602
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-2100 Dual-Core Processor 3.1 GHz 3 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I32100
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7445 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon X5650
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i3-2100
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | Intel Core i3-2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.