Key Differences
In short — Xeon X5650 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon X5650 is 993 days older than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Performs up to 1% better in War Thunder than Celeron G1610 - 130 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Xeon X5650 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
129
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |