Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 3541 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 95 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 9% better in HITMAN 3 than Xeon X5650 - 205 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5650 - 48 vs 12 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1055.11
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,055.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18063 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 48 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 280 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |