Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon w5-3435X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 34 days older than Xeon w5-3435X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon w5-3435X - 200 vs 191 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon w5-3435X doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
200
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€466.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €466.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57721 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Single-Core
2222
71.56199677938808%
Multi-Core
16995
77.84088306691706%
Intel Xeon w5-3435X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Feb 15th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Xeon W | Collection | Core i9 |
Sapphire Rapids | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 4677 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 150 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |