Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms Xeon W3690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 3363 days newer than Xeon W3690.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 14% better in Ready or Not than Xeon W3690 - 272 vs 238 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3690 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3690 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
272
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€185.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €185.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3690 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Gulftown | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |