Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Xeon W3690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 3363 days newer than Xeon W3690.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 47% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon W3690 - 368 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3690 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
368
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€100.31
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €100.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10796 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3690 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Gulftown | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |