Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Xeon W3690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 3065 days newer than Xeon W3690.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 46% better in War Thunder than Xeon W3690 - 197 vs 135 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon W3690 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3690 - 24 vs 12 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
197
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€300.29
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €300.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3690 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Gulftown | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |