Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4963 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 75% better in Rust than Xeon W3680 - 276 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3680 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
276
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€607.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €607.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58287 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Single-Core
555
17.897452434698486%
Multi-Core
2540
12.095238095238095%
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |