Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 4018 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 14% better in Deathloop than Xeon W3680 - 192 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3680 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€206.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €206.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 233 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |