Buy on Amazon
€170.42
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3698 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 7% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon W3680 - 137 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3680 - 16 vs 12 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€170.42
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for €170.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.