Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 3887 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 17% better in Escape From Tarkov than Xeon W3680 - 222 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3680 - 24 vs 12 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Ryzen 9 5900X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Vermeer |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
