Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 4677 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 15% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon W3680 - 134 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 120 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3680 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3680 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Single-Core
555
20.411916145641783%
Multi-Core
2540
16.74136567360928%
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
