Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Xeon W3670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3852 days newer than Xeon W3670.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 17% better in Escape From Tarkov than Xeon W3670 - 222 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon W3670 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3670 doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
222
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€146.08
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3670 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |