Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 5300G outperforms Xeon W3670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 5300G is 3880 days newer than Xeon W3670.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3670
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 5300G - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Tanks than Xeon W3670 - 544 vs 506 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3670 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3670 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W3670
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2010
Ryzen 3 5300G
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3670 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 5300G |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Cezanne |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
