Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Xeon W3565 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 3676 days newer than Xeon W3565.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3565
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 130 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 34% better in Rust than Xeon W3565 - 207 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3565 - 48 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
207
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1055.11
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,055.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Nov 1st, 2009
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3565 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Bloomfield | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 48 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 280 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |