Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Xeon W3565 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2839 days newer than Xeon W3565.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3565
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Xeon W3565 - 232 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3565 - 32 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
232
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€467.93
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €467.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Nov 1st, 2009
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3565 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Bloomfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |