Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms Xeon W3565 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 1318 days newer than Xeon W3565.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3565
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 130 vs 220 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon W3565 - 118 vs 117 FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
118
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€241.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €241.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Nov 1st, 2009
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3565 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Xeon | Collection | FX |
Bloomfield | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 220 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |