Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Xeon W3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 3917 days newer than Xeon W3550.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 8% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon W3550 - 161 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3550 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3550 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3550 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
161
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€223.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €223.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |