Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms Xeon W3530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 2485 days newer than Xeon W3530.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3530
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 4% better in Deathloop than Xeon W3530 - 174 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon W3530 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3530 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
174
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €39.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3530 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |