Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Xeon W3530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 3090 days newer than Xeon W3530.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3530
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 4% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon W3530 - 308 vs 296 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3530 - 32 vs 8 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
308
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€872.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €872.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3530 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Bloomfield | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |