Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 4663 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 24% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon W3520 - 177 vs 143 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €90.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65578 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Single-Core
413
18.849840255591054%
Multi-Core
1395
15.656565656565657%
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |